NSM Music Ltd v. Leefe [2005] UKEAT 0663_05_1412 (14 December 2005)
A debarred respondent may request written reasons only for the purpose of a review application under Rule 9(b); refusal of reasons for appeal purposes is lawful. Appeal against refusal of reasons dismissed; appeal against judgment stayed pending provision of reasons by Tribunal.
- Citation
- [2005] UKEAT 0663_05_1412
- Parties
- Appellant: NSM Music Ltd; Respondent: Mr Leefe
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal Against Refusal of Reasons and Stay of Appeal Against Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal against refusal of reasons dismissed; appeal against judgment stayed pending provision of reasons.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Debarring Orders, Request for Reasons, Review Applications, Quantum of Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NSM Music Ltd
Appellant
Mr Leefe
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal Against Refusal of Reasons and Stay of Appeal Against Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a debarred respondent may request written reasons for judgment under Rule 9
- 2 Whether refusal to provide reasons was lawful
- 3 Proportionality of debarring orders affecting both liability and quantum
Ratio Decidendi
A debarred respondent may request written reasons only for the purpose of a review application under Rule 9(b); refusal of reasons for appeal purposes is lawful. Appeal against refusal of reasons dismissed; appeal against judgment stayed pending provision of reasons by Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Appeal against refusal of reasons dismissed; appeal against judgment stayed pending provision of reasons.
Orders
- Employment Tribunal requested to provide written reasons within 35 days.
- Respondent to particularise appeal or abandon within 21 days of receipt of reasons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment