K Mayall v Nuffield Health (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2024] UKET 2305100/2023 (29 November 2024)
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to establish facts from which it could conclude that age discrimination occurred. The respondent provided a non-discriminatory explanation for its actions.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] UKET 2305100/2023
- Parties
- Claimant: K Mayall; Respondent: Nuffield Health
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination
Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
K Mayall
Claimant
Nuffield Health
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of age
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to establish facts from which it could conclude that age discrimination occurred. The respondent provided a non-discriminatory explanation for its actions.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment