NVCS Ltd v Revenue & Customs (STATUTORY MATERNITY PAY - entitlement to SMP) [2019] UKFTT 635 (TC) (17 October 2019)
A COT3 agreement cannot compromise an employee's statutory entitlement to SMP unless the payment is expressly made for SMP; the absence of express reference to SMP in the agreement means the £10,000 payment did not include SMP, and Mrs Dare remains entitled to SMP in addition to the settlement sum.
- Citation
- [2019] UKFTT 635 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: NVCS Limited; First Respondent: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs; Second Respondent: Kate Dare
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Maternity Pay, Settlement Agreements, COT3 Agreements, Waiver of Statutory Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NVCS Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
First Respondent
Kate Dare
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a COT3 settlement agreement can compromise a claim to statutory maternity pay (SMP)
- 2 Whether the payment of £10,000 under the COT3 agreement included Mrs Dare's entitlement to SMP
Ratio Decidendi
A COT3 agreement cannot compromise an employee's statutory entitlement to SMP unless the payment is expressly made for SMP; the absence of express reference to SMP in the agreement means the £10,000 payment did not include SMP, and Mrs Dare remains entitled to SMP in addition to the settlement sum.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed
Orders
- NVCS's appeal is dismissed.
- Mrs Dare's cross-appeal is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment