NWM Solutions Ltd v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX - PAYE - National Insurance Contributions - subsistence expenses - earnings - reimbursement of expense) [2023] UKFTT 364 (TC) (04 April 2023)
The Tribunal found that NWMSL's payments were reimbursements of expenses actually incurred by employees, not round sum allowances. The existence of a valid dispensation under s.65 ITEPA 2003 was determinative and removed the payments from charge to tax and NICs. HMRC failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify increasing the assessments or to show that the qualifying conditions of the dispensation were not met. The Tribunal exercised its discretion to refuse HMRC's late application to amend quantum, finding it would be unfair and prejudicial to NWMSL.
- Citation
- [2023] UKFTT 364 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: NWM Solutions Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax Chamber) / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Determinations and Decisions set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, PAYE, National Insurance Contributions, Subsistence Expenses, Reimbursement of Expenses, Dispensations, Earnings, Round Sum Allowances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NWM Solutions Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax Chamber) / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payments made by NWMSL to employees for subsistence expenses were 'round sum allowances' or reimbursement of expenses
- 2 Whether the existence of a dispensation under s.65 ITEPA 2003 was determinative of the tax and NICs treatment
- 3 Whether NWMSL satisfied the qualifying conditions of the dispensation
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that NWMSL's payments were reimbursements of expenses actually incurred by employees, not round sum allowances. The existence of a valid dispensation under s.65 ITEPA 2003 was determinative and removed the payments from charge to tax and NICs. HMRC failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify increasing the assessments or to show that the qualifying conditions of the dispensation were not met. The Tribunal exercised its discretion to refuse HMRC's late application to amend quantum, finding it would be unfair and prejudicial to NWMSL.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Determinations and Decisions set aside.
Orders
- HMRC's Determinations and Decisions dated 1 November 2017 are set aside.
- HMRC is denied permission to amend its Statement of Case to increase the quantum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment