Mr F Teklom v Oasis Cardiff (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2021] UKET 1600611/2021 (26 November 2021)

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by law and therefore the claim for detriment or dismissal on that basis fails.

Citation: [2021] UKET 1600611/2021
Parties: Claimant: Mr F Teklom; Respondent: Oasis Cardiff
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 26 November 2021
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr F Teklom

Claimant

Oasis Cardiff

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
2 Whether the respondent subjected the claimant to detriment or dismissal as a result of the disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by law and therefore the claim for detriment or dismissal on that basis fails.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed