Mr R Hill v Ocado Group (England and Wales : Unfair Dismissal) [2024] UKET 2402384/2024 (3 October 2024)
The tribunal found that Ocado Group failed to follow a fair procedure and did not have sufficient grounds for dismissal, rendering the dismissal unfair.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] UKET 2402384/2024
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr R Hill; Respondent: Ocado Group
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal
Employment Law Unfair Dismissal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr R Hill
Claimant
Ocado Group
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of Mr R Hill by Ocado Group was unfair under the Employment Rights Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that Ocado Group failed to follow a fair procedure and did not have sufficient grounds for dismissal, rendering the dismissal unfair.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Ocado Group to pay compensation to Mr R Hill for unfair dismissal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment