Broadlink UK v Oladimeji Awe (Full Decision _No Action) [2013] DRS 12413 (22 April 2013)

Broadlink UK v Oladimeji Awe (Full Decision _No Action) [2013] DRS 12413 (22 April 2013)

The complainant failed to establish rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name, and failed to prove that the registration was abusive.

Citation
[2013] DRS 12413
Parties
Complainant: Broadlink UK; Respondent: Oladimeji Awe
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 April 2013
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Broadlink UK

Complainant

Oladimeji Awe

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name, and failed to prove that the registration was abusive.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name