Swieca v Revenue & Customs (STATUTORY MATERNITY PAY - continuous employment) [2019] UKFTT 674 (TC) (06 November 2019)
Appellant was not continuously employed for the relevant 26-week period as she did not commence work until 3 May 2017; absence of work and remuneration prior to this date means employment had not begun, thus failing the statutory requirement for SMP.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] UKFTT 674 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Olga Swieca; First Respondent: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs; Second Respondent: Unique Employment Services Limited
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Maternity Pay, Continuous Employment, Agency Worker Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Olga Swieca
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
First Respondent
Unique Employment Services Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was in continuous employment for the period required by section 164(2)(a) of the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 to qualify for Statutory Maternity Pay
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant was not continuously employed for the relevant 26-week period as she did not commence work until 3 May 2017; absence of work and remuneration prior to this date means employment had not begun, thus failing the statutory requirement for SMP.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment