Miss S Kay v Optical Express and others (England and Wales : Sex Discrimination) [2017] UKET 2501225/2016 (21 February 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to less favourable treatment because of her sex, constituting unlawful sex discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2501225/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss S Kay; Respondent: Optical Express and others
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Sex Discrimination
Employment Law Equality Law Sex Discrimination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Miss S Kay
Claimant
Optical Express and others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to sex discrimination by the respondents
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to less favourable treatment because of her sex, constituting unlawful sex discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
Court Disposition
claim upheld
Orders
- Respondents to pay compensation to the claimant for sex discrimination
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment