Mr M Loizou v Optivo (England and Wales : Sex Discrimination) [2023] UKET 2302677/2020 (10 January 2023)

The tribunal found that the claimant did not prove, on the balance of probabilities, that he was treated less favourably because of his sex.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2023] UKET 2302677/2020
Parties: Claimant: Mr M Loizou; Respondent: Optivo
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 10 January 2023
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Sex Discrimination

Employment Law Equality Law Sex Discrimination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr M Loizou

Claimant

Optivo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of sex

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant did not prove, on the balance of probabilities, that he was treated less favourably because of his sex.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.