Ekpe v. Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis [2000] UKEAT 1044_00_1311 (13 November 2000)

The matter should proceed to full argument on the grounds set out in paragraph (c) of the appellant's skeleton argument, as the tribunal's finding on disability merits further consideration.

Citation: [2000] UKEAT 1044_00_1311
Parties: Appellant: Original Applicant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 13 November 2000
Procedural Posture: Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte
Outcome: Appeal to proceed to full argument on substituted grounds
Legal Topics: Disability Discrimination, Racial Victimisation, Statutory Interpretation

Employment Law Disability Law Disability Discrimination Racial Victimisation Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Original Applicant

Appellant

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte

Legal Issues

1 Whether the appellant was disabled within the meaning of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
2 Whether the appellant's claims were within the statutory time limit

Ratio Decidendi

The matter should proceed to full argument on the grounds set out in paragraph (c) of the appellant's skeleton argument, as the tribunal's finding on disability merits further consideration.

Court Disposition

Appeal to proceed to full argument on substituted grounds

Orders

Case to be listed as Category C
Hearing time estimate two hours