Mrs K Aktas v Original Smoke Shack Ltd: (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Disability Discrimination : Sex Discrimination : Time Off) [2017] UKET 3400345/2016 (30 June 2017)

The tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract and unlawfully discriminated against her on the grounds of disability and sex, and failed to provide required time off.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 3400345/2016
Parties: Claimant: Mrs K Aktas; Respondent: Original Smoke Shack Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 30 June 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Disability Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Time Off

Employment Law Equality Law Breach of Contract Disability Discrimination Sex Discrimination Time Off

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mrs K Aktas

Claimant

Original Smoke Shack Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent breached the claimant's employment contract
2 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on grounds of disability
3 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on grounds of sex

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract and unlawfully discriminated against her on the grounds of disability and sex, and failed to provide required time off.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation to claimant
Respondent to comply with statutory obligations regarding time off

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.