Associated Newspapers Ltd v Webster [2008] DRS 5752 (16 July 2008)
The complainant established rights in the 'Scottish Daily Mail' mark, and the domain name was found to be identical or similar. The respondent's use of the domain took unfair advantage of the complainant's rights by diverting business and creating confusion. The respondent's pattern of previous abusive registrations and failure to rebut the presumption confirmed the finding of abusive registration.
- Citation
- [2008] DRS 5752
- Parties
- Complainant: Associated Newspapers Limited; Respondent: Owen Webster
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute (nominet Drs) / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld; domain transferred
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Marks, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Associated Newspapers Limited
Complainant
Owen Webster
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute (nominet Drs) / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in the name or mark identical or similar to the disputed domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the 'Scottish Daily Mail' mark, and the domain name was found to be identical or similar. The respondent's use of the domain took unfair advantage of the complainant's rights by diverting business and creating confusion. The respondent's pattern of previous abusive registrations and failure to rebut the presumption confirmed the finding of abusive registration.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld; domain transferred
Orders
- The domain name scottishdailymail.co.uk is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment