Groupama SA v Webster [2007] DRS 4952 (5 October 2007)

Groupama SA v Webster [2007] DRS 4952 (5 October 2007)

The complainant established rights in the GROUPAMA mark and trading names, and the respondent had three prior findings of abusive registration within two years, triggering a presumption of abuse. The respondent did not rebut this presumption. Therefore, the domain name is an abusive registration and should be transferred.

Citation
[2007] DRS 4952
Parties
Complainant: Groupama SA; Respondent: Owen Webster
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
05 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
Outcome
Domain name to be transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Trade Mark Infringement, Abusive Registration, Goodwill, Presumption of Abuse
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Trade Mark Infringement Abusive Registration Goodwill Presumption of Abuse

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Groupama SA

Complainant

Owen Webster

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
  2. 2 Whether the domain name is an abusive registration in the hands of the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the GROUPAMA mark and trading names, and the respondent had three prior findings of abusive registration within two years, triggering a presumption of abuse. The respondent did not rebut this presumption. Therefore, the domain name is an abusive registration and should be transferred.

Court Disposition

Domain name to be transferred to complainant

Orders

  • The domain name groupamainsurance.co.uk is to be transferred to Groupama Insurance Company Limited