Hill v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 612 (TC) (26 September 2012)
The First-tier Tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider appeals against HMRC's refusal to apply ESC A19, as there is no statutory right of appeal. Article 6 ECHR is not engaged in this context, and the appropriate remedy is judicial review, not a tribunal appeal.
- Citation
- [2012] UKFTT 612 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Patrick Hill; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Appeal / Jurisdictional Challenge/strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out for lack of jurisdiction
- Legal Topics
- PAYE Underpayment, Extra Statutory Concession A19, Jurisdiction of First Tier Tribunal, Article 6 ECHR, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Hill
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal / Jurisdictional Challenge/strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider HMRC's refusal to apply ESC A19
- 2 Whether refusal to apply ESC A19 is an appealable decision
- 3 Whether Article 6 ECHR is engaged in this context
Ratio Decidendi
The First-tier Tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider appeals against HMRC's refusal to apply ESC A19, as there is no statutory right of appeal. Article 6 ECHR is not engaged in this context, and the appropriate remedy is judicial review, not a tribunal appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out for lack of jurisdiction
Orders
- The appeal is struck out under Rule 8 of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment