Kearney v Revenue and Customs (CAPITAL GAINS TAX - whether individual resident in the UK during the relevant period on common law (pre-Finance Act 2013) principles) [2026] UKFTT 125 (TC) (14 January 2026)
Mr Kearney was UK resident during the relevant period under common law principles, as he did not effect a distinct break from the UK in his pattern of life, retained significant business and personal ties, and had available accommodation. HMRC's discovery assessments were validly made under section 29(1) TMA 1970,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] UKFTT 125 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Patrick Kearney; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals against tax assessments dismissed; appeals against penalties dismissed subject to reductions in quantum
- Legal Topics
- Capital Gains Tax, Tax Residence, Discovery Assessments, Negligence in Tax Returns, Penalties for Incorrect Returns
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Kearney
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Kearney was UK resident during the relevant period under common law (pre-Finance Act 2013) principles
- 2 Whether HMRC made valid discovery assessments under section 29(1) Taxes Management Act 1970
- 3 Whether Mr Kearney was negligent/careless in submitting self-assessment returns
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Kearney was UK resident during the relevant period under common law principles, as he did not effect a distinct break from the UK in his pattern of life, retained significant business and personal ties, and had available accommodation. HMRC's discovery assessments were validly made under section 29(1) TMA 1970, as there was sufficient evidence of loss of tax due to Mr Kearney's negligent/careless conduct in submitting incorrect self-assessment returns. The negligence/carelessness led to a loss of tax, justifying the imposition of penalties, though quantum was subject to reduction.
Court Disposition
Appeals against tax assessments dismissed; appeals against penalties dismissed subject to reductions in quantum
Orders
- Tax assessments for the relevant years upheld
- Penalties upheld subject to reductions in amount as determined by the Tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment