Jaguar Land Rover Limited v Paul Banham (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17556 (23 July 2016)

Jaguar Land Rover Limited v Paul Banham (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17556 (23 July 2016)

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17556
Parties
Complainant: Jaguar Land Rover Limited; Respondent: Paul Banham
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jaguar Land Rover Limited

Complainant

Paul Banham

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name should be transferred to the complainant
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's registration was abusive

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • Transfer of the disputed domain name to Jaguar Land Rover Limited