HIGHDRIVE PROPERTY CO. LIMITED v Paul Conibere (Summary Decision _No Action) [2020] DRS 22221 (19 February 2020)
The complainant failed to establish that the domain name was an abusive registration under the DRS Policy; therefore, no action was taken.
- Citation
- [2020] DRS 22221
- Parties
- Complainant: HIGHDRIVE PROPERTY CO. LIMITED; Respondent: Paul Conibere
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- No Action
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, DRS Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
HIGHDRIVE PROPERTY CO. LIMITED
Complainant
Paul Conibere
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration was abusive under the DRS Policy
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant failed to establish that the domain name was an abusive registration under the DRS Policy; therefore, no action was taken.
Court Disposition
No Action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment