Daniel v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 173 (TC) (10 February 2014)
The appellant did not perform full-time work abroad for the whole tax year 1999-2000; substantive duties were performed in the UK and the evidence did not support continuous full-time employment abroad. The appellant made his claim of non-residence without proper review of his work pattern and UK duties, constituting negligent conduct. The discovery assessment was valid.
- Citation
- [2014] UKFTT 173 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Paul Daniel; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Capital Gains Tax, Residence Status, Negligent Conduct, Discovery Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Daniel
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's employment in the tax year 1999-2000 involved full-time work abroad and thus sustained his claim to be non-UK resident for the year
- 2 Whether the appellant had been responsible for negligent conduct in filing his relevant tax return and claiming to be non-UK resident, validating the assessment that was otherwise out of time
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not perform full-time work abroad for the whole tax year 1999-2000; substantive duties were performed in the UK and the evidence did not support continuous full-time employment abroad. The appellant made his claim of non-residence without proper review of his work pattern and UK duties, constituting negligent conduct. The discovery assessment was valid.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Assessment for capital gains tax and income tax for the year 1999-2000 upheld
- Appellant found responsible for negligent conduct in filing tax return
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment