Duckmanton v Revenue & Customs (Rev 1) [2011] UKFTT 664 (TC) (13 October 2011)

Duckmanton v Revenue & Customs (Rev 1) [2011] UKFTT 664 (TC) (13 October 2011)

The legal expenses were not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of trade, as the main purpose was to defend criminal charges and preserve personal liberty and reputation, not solely to preserve the business; therefore, the expenses are disallowed under s 74 ICTA 1988 and s 34 ITTOIA 2005.

Citation
[2011] UKFTT 664 (TC)
Parties
Appellant: Paul Duckmanton; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
13 October 2011
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Appeal disallowed
Legal Topics
Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Exemptions and Reliefs, Deductibility of Legal Expenses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Duckmanton

Appellant

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision

  1. 1 Whether legal costs incurred in defending criminal charges and preserving trade interests were incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of trade under s 74 ICTA 1988 and s 34 ITTOIA 2005

Ratio Decidendi

The legal expenses were not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of trade, as the main purpose was to defend criminal charges and preserve personal liberty and reputation, not solely to preserve the business; therefore, the expenses are disallowed under s 74 ICTA 1988 and s 34 ITTOIA 2005.

Court Disposition

Appeal disallowed

Orders

  • Expenses claimed for legal and professional fees are disallowed for tax purposes under s 74 ICTA 1988 and s 34 ITTOIA 2005.