Duckmanton v Revenue & Customs (Rev 1) [2011] UKFTT 664 (TC) (13 October 2011)
The legal expenses were not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of trade, as the main purpose was to defend criminal charges and preserve personal liberty and reputation, not solely to preserve the business; therefore, the expenses are disallowed under s 74 ICTA 1988 and s 34 ITTOIA 2005.
- Citation
- [2011] UKFTT 664 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Paul Duckmanton; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal disallowed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Exemptions and Reliefs, Deductibility of Legal Expenses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Duckmanton
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether legal costs incurred in defending criminal charges and preserving trade interests were incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of trade under s 74 ICTA 1988 and s 34 ITTOIA 2005
Ratio Decidendi
The legal expenses were not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of trade, as the main purpose was to defend criminal charges and preserve personal liberty and reputation, not solely to preserve the business; therefore, the expenses are disallowed under s 74 ICTA 1988 and s 34 ITTOIA 2005.
Court Disposition
Appeal disallowed
Orders
- Expenses claimed for legal and professional fees are disallowed for tax purposes under s 74 ICTA 1988 and s 34 ITTOIA 2005.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment