Wright v Revenue and Customs [2011] UKFTT 14 (TC) (20 December 2010)
The appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for failing to pay tax on time. Cash flow difficulties arose from his own lack of foresight and due diligence, and he failed to seek timely advice or arrange payment with HMRC. The Tribunal found the appellant was not misled by the accountant and that the consequences of withdrawal of gross payment status do not constitute a reasonable excuse.
- Citation
- [2011] UKFTT 14
- Parties
- Appellant: Paul Wright; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Final Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Construction Industry Scheme, Gross Payment Status, Compliance Test, Reasonable Excuse, Income Tax Self Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Wright
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for failing to meet the compliance test for gross payment status under the Construction Industry Scheme
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for failing to pay tax on time. Cash flow difficulties arose from his own lack of foresight and due diligence, and he failed to seek timely advice or arrange payment with HMRC. The Tribunal found the appellant was not misled by the accountant and that the consequences of withdrawal of gross payment status do not constitute a reasonable excuse.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Decision withdrawing gross payment status from the appellant is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment