Alliance & Leicester plc v Paul's Cameras [2006] DRS 3280 (9 March 2006)
The complainant has rights in the name Alliance & Leicester, which is similar to the disputed domain name. The respondent has engaged in a pattern of registering domain names corresponding to well-known financial institutions without legitimate interest, and the domain name was registered in a manner that took unfair advantage of the complainant's rights. The domain name is an abusive registration and should be transferred to the complainant.
- Citation
- [2006] DRS 3280
- Parties
- Complainant: Alliance & Leicester plc; Respondent: Paul's Cameras
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert
- Outcome
- Domain name to be transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Mark Infringement, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alliance & Leicester plc
Complainant
Paul's Cameras
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant has rights in the name Alliance & Leicester, which is similar to the disputed domain name. The respondent has engaged in a pattern of registering domain names corresponding to well-known financial institutions without legitimate interest, and the domain name was registered in a manner that took unfair advantage of the complainant's rights. The domain name is an abusive registration and should be transferred to the complainant.
Court Disposition
Domain name to be transferred to complainant
Orders
- The domain name allianceandleicesterbankplc.co.uk is to be transferred to Alliance & Leicester plc
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment