Mr T Wishart v (1) Peninsula Business Services Ltd (2) Ms J English: (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure : Race Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 2302834/2015 (24 April 2017)

Mr T Wishart v (1) Peninsula Business Services Ltd (2) Ms J English: (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure : Race Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 2302834/2015 (24 April 2017)

The tribunal determined whether the claimant's dismissal and treatment amounted to unfair dismissal, race discrimination, protected disclosure detriment, and unlawful deduction from wages based on the evidence and statutory provisions.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] UKET 2302834/2015
Parties
Claimant: Mr T Wishart; Respondent: Peninsula Business Services Ltd; Respondent: Ms J English
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
24 April 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the respondents
Legal Topics
Public Interest Disclosure, Race Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages
Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Race Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr T Wishart

Claimant

Peninsula Business Services Ltd

Respondent

Ms J English

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was subjected to race discrimination
  3. 3 Whether there was a public interest disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined whether the claimant's dismissal and treatment amounted to unfair dismissal, race discrimination, protected disclosure detriment, and unlawful deduction from wages based on the evidence and statutory provisions.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the respondents