Lego Juris A/S v Personal (Summary Decision) [2012] DRS 11071 (01 May 2012)

Lego Juris A/S v Personal (Summary Decision) [2012] DRS 11071 (01 May 2012)

The panel found that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark, the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and the domain name was registered in bad faith.

Citation
[2012] DRS 11071
Parties
Complainant: Lego Juris A/S; Respondent: Personal
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
01 May 2012
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint upheld
Legal Topics
Domain Name Disputes, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Law Internet Law Domain Name Disputes Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lego Juris A/S

Complainant

Personal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the domain name infringes the complainant's trademark rights
  2. 2 Whether the domain name was registered in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark, the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and the domain name was registered in bad faith.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld

Orders

  • Transfer of the domain name to the complainant