Sprinklr UK LTD Sprinklr Inc. v Personal Yang HongJuan (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 18171 (02 March 2017)

The complainant established rights in the SPRINKLR mark and demonstrated that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] DRS 18171
Parties: Complainant: Sprinklr UK LTD; Complainant: Sprinklr Inc.; Respondent: Personal Yang HongJuan
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 02 March 2017
Procedural Posture: Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome: complaint upheld
Legal Topics: Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement

Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Sprinklr UK LTD

Complainant

Sprinklr Inc.

Complainant

Personal Yang HongJuan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the domain name registration by the respondent is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy
2 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the SPRINKLR mark and demonstrated that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

complaint upheld

Orders

The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.