Pertemps Ltd v Revenue & Customs (PROCEDURE : Other) [2015] UKFTT 512 (TC) (07 October 2015)
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to determine grounds of appeal based on HMRC’s exercise of collection and management powers or public law arguments such as legitimate expectation or abuse of power. Such matters are for judicial review in the Administrative Court, not for determination under s 83 VAT Act 1994. Accordingly, paragraphs 7-25 of the amended grounds of appeal must be struck out under Rule 8(2) as outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2015] UKFTT 512 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Pertemps Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Assessment Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Strike Out of Part of Grounds of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; paragraphs 7-25 of the amended grounds of appeal struck out for want of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- VAT Assessment, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Strike Out Applications, Collection and Management Powers, Legitimate Expectation, Public Law Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pertemps Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Assessment Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Strike Out of Part of Grounds of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider grounds based on HMRC's collection and management powers under Schedule 11 VAT Act 1994
- 2 Whether paragraphs 7-25 of the amended grounds of appeal should be struck out under Rule 8(2) or 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure Rules
- 3 Whether the grounds assert a public law matter outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to determine grounds of appeal based on HMRC’s exercise of collection and management powers or public law arguments such as legitimate expectation or abuse of power. Such matters are for judicial review in the Administrative Court, not for determination under s 83 VAT Act 1994. Accordingly, paragraphs 7-25 of the amended grounds of appeal must be struck out under Rule 8(2) as outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; paragraphs 7-25 of the amended grounds of appeal struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- Paragraphs 7-25 of the amended grounds of appeal are struck out under Rule 8(2) of the Tribunal Procedure Rules.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment