Akhtar v Revenue and Customs [2025] UKFTT 395 (TC) (02 April 2025)
The Tribunal found that valid discoveries were made under section 29 TMA 1970 and that some unexplained bank deposits were untaxed withdrawals from the appellant's business, justifying assessments for those amounts. However, the Tribunal accepted that for certain property deposits, the appellant provided sufficient...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 395 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Pervez Akhtar; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Discovery Assessments, Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Constructive Trusts, Unexplained Bank Deposits, Beneficial Ownership, Rental Income, Deliberate Behaviour, Burden of Proof
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pervez Akhtar
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the discovery assessments issued under section 29 TMA 1970 were valid and in time
- 2 Whether the appellant provided satisfactory explanations for the source of funds for unexplained bank deposits
- 3 Whether the source of funds for property purchases was untaxed withdrawals from the appellant's business or provided by friends and relatives
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that valid discoveries were made under section 29 TMA 1970 and that some unexplained bank deposits were untaxed withdrawals from the appellant's business, justifying assessments for those amounts. However, the Tribunal accepted that for certain property deposits, the appellant provided sufficient evidence that funds were provided by friends and relatives, and that in some cases properties were held on constructive trust for those third parties. The Tribunal also found that, for some properties, beneficial ownership was shared with the appellant's wife, affecting the allocation of capital gains and rental income. The assessments were upheld in part and reduced accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Assessments reduced to reflect only those unexplained deposits and property gains/rental income for which the appellant was found liable; HMRC to issue revised assessments accordingly.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment