ACCOR SA v Love [2006] DRS 3136 (24 January 2006)
The respondent registered a domain name identical to the complainant's well-known trademark, was aware of the trademark, had no legitimate rights or connection to the mark, and provided no explanation for the registration. The only conceivable reason for registration was to take unfair advantage of the complainant's goodwill. This constitutes abusive registration under the DRS Policy.
- Citation
- [2006] DRS 3136
- Parties
- Complainant: ACCOR S. A.; Respondent: Peter Love
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Trademark Infringement, Domain Name Dispute, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ACCOR S. A.
Complainant
Peter Love
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name is an abusive registration in the hands of the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent registered a domain name identical to the complainant's well-known trademark, was aware of the trademark, had no legitimate rights or connection to the mark, and provided no explanation for the registration. The only conceivable reason for registration was to take unfair advantage of the complainant's goodwill. This constitutes abusive registration under the DRS Policy.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to complainant
Orders
- The disputed domain name novotel.co.uk is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment