Marshall v Information Commissioner & Anor [2025] UKFTT 288 (GRC) (11 March 2025)

Marshall v Information Commissioner & Anor [2025] UKFTT 288 (GRC) (11 March 2025)

The Tribunal found the request vexatious due to the unreasonable burden on the Trust from a long history of requests, the tangential and diminishing value of the information sought, and the fact that the core issues had been addressed years earlier. The right to information under FOIA is not to be used as a tool for personal campaigns or compensation claims. The Commissioner's decision was correct and lawful.

Citation
[2025] UKFTT 288 (GRC)
Parties
Appellant: Peter Marshall; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: The London Ambulance Service NHS Trust
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
11 March 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Freedom of Information Act 2000 (foia) S57 / Final Decision on the Papers
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Freedom of Information, Vexatious Requests, Public Authority Obligations, Appeals Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Marshall

Appellant

The Information Commissioner

First Respondent

The London Ambulance Service NHS Trust

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Freedom of Information Act 2000 (foia) S57 / Final Decision on the Papers

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's FOIA request was vexatious under s14(1)
  2. 2 Whether the Information Commissioner's decision to uphold the refusal was lawful

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found the request vexatious due to the unreasonable burden on the Trust from a long history of requests, the tangential and diminishing value of the information sought, and the fact that the core issues had been addressed years earlier. The right to information under FOIA is not to be used as a tool for personal campaigns or compensation claims. The Commissioner's decision was correct and lawful.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed