Innox Trading Ltd v Peter Mason (Full Decision _No Action) [2014] DRS 14891 (01 December 2014)

Innox Trading Ltd v Peter Mason (Full Decision _No Action) [2014] DRS 14891 (01 December 2014)

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2014] DRS 14891
Parties
Complainant: Innox Trading Ltd; Respondent: Peter Mason
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
01 December 2014
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Information Technology Domain Name Dispute Passing Off Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Innox Trading Ltd

Complainant

Peter Mason

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name