Silvester v Revenue & Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Losses) [2015] UKFTT 532 (TC) (30 October 2015)
Section 67 ITA applies to all farming activities with consecutive losses, not just 'hobby' farming; the appellant's farming activities did not meet the reasonable expectation of profit test in section 68; HMRC could not reasonably have been expected to be aware of the five years of losses from the information made available, so the discovery assessment for 2008-09 is valid.
- Citation
- [2015] UKFTT 532 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Silvester; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Loss Relief, Farming Losses, Discovery Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Silvester
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 67 Income Tax Act 2007 restrict loss relief for farming losses to 'hobby' farming?
- 2 Did the appellant's farming activities meet the 'reasonable expectation of profit' test in section 68 Income Tax Act 2007?
- 3 Was HMRC's discovery assessment under section 29 Taxes Management Act 1970 valid?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 67 ITA applies to all farming activities with consecutive losses, not just 'hobby' farming; the appellant's farming activities did not meet the reasonable expectation of profit test in section 68; HMRC could not reasonably have been expected to be aware of the five years of losses from the information made available, so the discovery assessment for 2008-09 is valid.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Loss relief for farming losses in 2008-09 and 2009-10 disallowed
- Discovery assessment for 2008-09 upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment