Boyle v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 723 (TC) (29 November 2013)
The Tribunal found that the so-called loans received by Mr Boyle were in substance earnings from employment and taxable as such. The arrangements were artificial and designed to avoid tax. The discovery assessments were valid. Mr Boyle was not entitled to PAYE credit as SCL had no UK tax presence and was not required to operate PAYE.
- Citation
- [2013] UKFTT 723
- Parties
- Appellant: Philip Boyle; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Substantive Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Employment Income, PAYE, Discovery Assessment, Tax Avoidance, Transfer of Assets Abroad
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip Boyle
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Substantive Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Boyle is liable to income tax on purported loans as employment income
- 2 Whether Mr Boyle is entitled to credit for PAYE not deducted by employer
- 3 Whether Mr Boyle is liable under transfer of assets abroad provisions
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the so-called loans received by Mr Boyle were in substance earnings from employment and taxable as such. The arrangements were artificial and designed to avoid tax. The discovery assessments were valid. Mr Boyle was not entitled to PAYE credit as SCL had no UK tax presence and was not required to operate PAYE.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Discovery assessments and closure notice upheld
- Mr Boyle liable for additional income tax as assessed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment