Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v Phily Helen (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 12507 (18 March 2013)
The Panel found that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark, that the Respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Accordingly, the domain name should be transferred to the Complainant.
- Citation
- [2013] DRS 12507
- Parties
- Complainant: Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft; Respondent: Phily Helen
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to Complainant
- Legal Topics
- Trademark Infringement, Domain Name Transfer
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft
Complainant
Phily Helen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the Respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
- 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark, that the Respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Accordingly, the domain name should be transferred to the Complainant.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to Complainant
Orders
- Transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment