Mr T Nagy v Pirtek (UK) Ltd and Chris Stuckey (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2020] UKET 2202806/2019 (9 January 2020)

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by law and therefore the claims for detriment and dismissal on the grounds of whistleblowing failed.

Citation: [2020] UKET 2202806/2019
Parties: Claimant: Mr T Nagy; Respondent: Pirtek (UK) Ltd; Respondent: Chris Stuckey
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 09 January 2020
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr T Nagy

Claimant

Pirtek (UK) Ltd

Respondent

Chris Stuckey

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
2 Whether the claimant suffered detriment or dismissal as a result of making a protected disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by law and therefore the claims for detriment and dismissal on the grounds of whistleblowing failed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed