Puddycats Cats Cattery v Pixel Art Guild (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19034 (25 July 2017)
The Panel found that the Complainant has rights in the name and that the Respondent's registration was abusive, warranting a transfer of the domain name.
- Citation
- [2017] DRS 19034
- Parties
- Complainant: Puddycats Cats Cattery; Respondent: Pixel Art Guild
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to Complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Puddycats Cats Cattery
Complainant
Pixel Art Guild
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration by the Respondent is abusive
- 2 Whether the Complainant has rights in respect of a name or mark which is identical or similar to the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the Complainant has rights in the name and that the Respondent's registration was abusive, warranting a transfer of the domain name.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to Complainant
Orders
- Transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment