Mr M Russell v Pochin's Ltd (In Administration) (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2021] UKET 2413720/2019 (25 January 2021)
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its statutory duty to consult collectively prior to redundancy, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] UKET 2413720/2019
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr M Russell; Respondent: Pochin's Ltd (In Administration)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Protective Award, Redundancy, Collective Consultation
Employment Law Protective Award Redundancy Collective Consultation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr M Russell
Claimant
Pochin's Ltd (In Administration)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory requirements for collective consultation prior to redundancy
- 2 Entitlement of the claimant to a protective award
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its statutory duty to consult collectively prior to redundancy, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Respondent to pay a protective award to the claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment