Rodeler Ltd v Pokerlistings (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 16803 (07 March 2016)

Rodeler Ltd v Pokerlistings (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 16803 (07 March 2016)

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, that the domain name was confusingly similar, that the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.

Citation
[2016] DRS 16803
Parties
Complainant: Rodeler Ltd; Respondent: Pokerlistings
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
07 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Complaint upheld
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Passing Off Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rodeler Ltd

Complainant

Pokerlistings

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, that the domain name was confusingly similar, that the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant