Post Office & Anor v Chin [1998] UKEAT 162_97_2402 (24 February 1998)
The Industrial Tribunal was entitled to find, based on Mr Chin's evidence, that racial harassment continued after 18th May 1995 and that the Post Office failed to take all reasonable steps to prevent it, making the Post Office liable. Mr Cook was not personally liable as there was no basis for individual liability under the statute.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 162_97_2402
- Parties
- Appellant: Post Office; Appellant: Mr Cook; Respondent: Mr Chin
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal by Mr Cook allowed; appeal by Post Office dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Harassment at Work, Vicarious Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Post Office
Appellant
Mr Cook
Appellant
Mr Chin
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Post Office was liable for racial harassment of Mr Chin after 18th May 1995
- 2 Whether Mr Cook was personally liable for racial discrimination
Ratio Decidendi
The Industrial Tribunal was entitled to find, based on Mr Chin's evidence, that racial harassment continued after 18th May 1995 and that the Post Office failed to take all reasonable steps to prevent it, making the Post Office liable. Mr Cook was not personally liable as there was no basis for individual liability under the statute.
Court Disposition
Appeal by Mr Cook allowed; appeal by Post Office dismissed
Orders
- Mr Cook fully exonerated and not personally liable for racial discrimination
- Post Office remains liable for racial harassment of Mr Chin after 18th May 1995
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment