Mr R Aslam v Poundworld Retail Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Race Discrimination : Sex Discrimination : Time Off : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 3300323/2017 (17 June 2017)

The tribunal found that the respondent had breached the claimant's contract and made unlawful deductions from wages but did not find sufficient evidence of race or sex discrimination.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 3300323/2017
Parties: Claimant: Mr R Aslam; Respondent: Poundworld Retail Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 17 June 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Partially upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Race Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Time Off, Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Employment Law Breach of Contract Race Discrimination Sex Discrimination Time Off Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr R Aslam

Claimant

Poundworld Retail Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment
2 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of race and sex
3 Whether the respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent had breached the claimant's contract and made unlawful deductions from wages but did not find sufficient evidence of race or sex discrimination.

Court Disposition

Partially upheld

Orders

The respondent is ordered to pay the claimant compensation for breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.