Mr G Iwundu v Precious Homes Ltd (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2024] UKET 3311582/2023 (29 November 2024)
The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts from which it could conclude that age was a factor in his treatment or dismissal. The respondent provided a non-discriminatory explanation for the dismissal, and the claim was therefore dismissed.
- Citation
- [2024] UKET 3311582/2023
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr G Iwundu; Respondent: Precious Homes Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr G Iwundu
Claimant
Precious Homes Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to age discrimination by the respondent
- 2 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts from which it could conclude that age was a factor in his treatment or dismissal. The respondent provided a non-discriminatory explanation for the dismissal, and the claim was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment