Colgate-Palmolive Company v Premium Domain [2005] DRS 02415 (25 April 2005)
The complainant has rights in the COLGATE-PALMOLIVE mark, which is identical to the domain name. The respondent's registration and use of the domain name, including offering it for sale at a price far exceeding out-of-pocket costs and using it to display sponsored links, constitute abusive registration as defined by the Policy. The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.
- Citation
- [2005] DRS 02415
- Parties
- Complainant: Colgate-Palmolive Company; Respondent: Premium Domain
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld; domain name to be transferred to complainant.
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Marks, Passing Off, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colgate-Palmolive Company
Complainant
Premium Domain
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name is an abusive registration in the hands of the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant has rights in the COLGATE-PALMOLIVE mark, which is identical to the domain name. The respondent's registration and use of the domain name, including offering it for sale at a price far exceeding out-of-pocket costs and using it to display sponsored links, constitute abusive registration as defined by the Policy. The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld; domain name to be transferred to complainant.
Orders
- The domain name colgate-palmolive.co.uk is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment