Mr E Bell v Prime Time Recruitment Ltd and others: (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure : Race Discrimination) [2017] UKET 2401732/2016 (21 April 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure and was discriminated against on the basis of race, in violation of statutory protections.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2401732/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr E Bell; Respondent: Prime Time Recruitment Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Race Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr E Bell
Claimant
Prime Time Recruitment Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure
- 2 Whether the claimant was discriminated against on the basis of race
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure and was discriminated against on the basis of race, in violation of statutory protections.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Respondent to pay compensation to claimant
- Respondent to implement anti-discrimination measures
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment