Lee v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 520 (TC) (28 October 2010)
Mrs Lee was not carrying on a business for VAT purposes at the relevant times; the sale of Kingsley Court was not in the course of a business but was a compensatory transaction under a court order. Accordingly, she was not registrable for VAT, not entitled to input tax recovery, and not entitled to interest.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 520 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Priti Lee; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Registration, Input Tax Recovery, Business Activity for VAT Purposes, Cancellation of VAT Registration, Interest on VAT Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Priti Lee
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Lee was carrying on a business for VAT purposes at the relevant times
- 2 Whether HMRC was correct to cancel Mrs Lee’s VAT registration under VATA, Sch 1, para 13(3)
- 3 Whether Mrs Lee was entitled to recover input tax for specified VAT periods
Ratio Decidendi
Mrs Lee was not carrying on a business for VAT purposes at the relevant times; the sale of Kingsley Court was not in the course of a business but was a compensatory transaction under a court order. Accordingly, she was not registrable for VAT, not entitled to input tax recovery, and not entitled to interest.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Mrs Lee’s appeal against cancellation of VAT registration is dismissed.
- Mrs Lee’s appeals against assessments and rejection of input tax claims are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment