Cosmo Gaming Company Ltd. v PRIVATEDNS PROXY REGISTRATION (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 18254 (28 February 2017)

Cosmo Gaming Company Ltd. v PRIVATEDNS PROXY REGISTRATION (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 18254 (28 February 2017)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name or mark, that the domain name was identical or similar, and that the respondent had registered and used the domain name in bad faith.

Citation
[2017] DRS 18254
Parties
Complainant: Cosmo Gaming Company Ltd.; Respondent: PRIVATEDNS PROXY REGISTRATION
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
28 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cosmo Gaming Company Ltd.

Complainant

PRIVATEDNS PROXY REGISTRATION

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the domain name has been registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name or mark, that the domain name was identical or similar, and that the respondent had registered and used the domain name in bad faith.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.