Curley v. Nuffield Nursing Homes Trust [2000] UKEAT 651_00_0311 (3 November 2000)
There was no breach of any express or implied contractual duty by the respondent; the appellant's resignation did not fall within the provisions of Section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and the claim for unfair dismissal fails.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 651_00_0311
- Parties
- Appellant: Proposed Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Proposed Appellant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was constructively dismissed
- 2 Whether there was a breach of contract by the respondent
- 3 Whether the appellant's resignation constituted unfair dismissal under Section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
There was no breach of any express or implied contractual duty by the respondent; the appellant's resignation did not fall within the provisions of Section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and the claim for unfair dismissal fails.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed at preliminary hearing stage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment