Guanghwa Company Ltd -v- Proton [2004] DRS 1575 (7 May 2004)
The complainant proved rights in the name 'Guanghwa' but failed to provide evidence that the domain name was an abusive registration; bare assertions without supporting evidence are insufficient under the Policy.
- Citation
- [2004] DRS 1575
- Parties
- Complainant: Guanghwa Company Limited; Respondent: Proton
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint rejected
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Registration, Abusive Registration, Company Name Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Guanghwa Company Limited
Complainant
Proton
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name constitutes an abusive registration in the hands of the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant proved rights in the name 'Guanghwa' but failed to provide evidence that the domain name was an abusive registration; bare assertions without supporting evidence are insufficient under the Policy.
Court Disposition
Complaint rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment