Skorpio Limited v Qlant Esnna (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19343 (13 November 2017)
The complainant established rights in the name or mark and demonstrated that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. The respondent failed to respond. The domain name should be transferred to the complainant.
- Citation
- [2017] DRS 19343
- Parties
- Complainant: Skorpio Limited; Respondent: Qlant Esnna
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trade Mark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Skorpio Limited
Complainant
Qlant Esnna
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the domain name has been registered or is being used in bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the name or mark and demonstrated that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. The respondent failed to respond. The domain name should be transferred to the complainant.
Court Disposition
Transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment