C Fisher v Qube Qualifications and Development Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2025] UKET 3305298/2023 (6 March 2025)

The tribunal found the claimant entitled to certain payments from the Secretary of State as the employer was insolvent and the claim fell within statutory provisions.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] UKET 3305298/2023
Parties: Claimant: C Fisher; Respondent: Qube Qualifications and Development Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation); Respondent: Secretary of State for Business and Trade
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 06 March 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim partly upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Insolvency, Statutory Payments

Employment Law Breach of Contract Insolvency Statutory Payments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

C Fisher

Claimant

Qube Qualifications and Development Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)

Respondent

Secretary of State for Business and Trade

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant is entitled to payments for breach of contract following the respondent's insolvency
2 Whether the Secretary of State is liable for outstanding payments under statutory provisions

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found the claimant entitled to certain payments from the Secretary of State as the employer was insolvent and the claim fell within statutory provisions.

Court Disposition

Claim partly upheld

Orders

Secretary of State to pay the claimant statutory entitlements as determined by the tribunal

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.