Mrs V Neal v Qube Qualifications and Development Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2025] UKET 3305207/2023 (17 February 2025)
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements, and the claimant is entitled to a protective award.
- Citation
- [2025] UKET 3305207/2023
- Parties
- Claimant: Mrs V Neal; Respondent: Qube Qualifications and Development Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation); Respondent: Secretary of State for Business and Trade
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Protective award granted in favour of the claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Employee Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mrs V Neal
Claimant
Qube Qualifications and Development Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)
Respondent
Secretary of State for Business and Trade
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a protective award
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements, and the claimant is entitled to a protective award.
Court Disposition
Protective award granted in favour of the claimant.
Orders
- Respondent to pay protective award to the claimant, liability to be met by the Secretary of State for Business and Trade due to insolvency.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment