Miss L Mumford v Qube Qualifications and Development Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2025] UKET 3308176/2023 (15 May 2025)

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements and awarded the claimant a protective award.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] UKET 3308176/2023
Parties: Claimant: Miss L Mumford; Respondent: Qube Qualifications and Development Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 15 May 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award
Outcome: Protective award granted in favour of the claimant.
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Redundancy, Collective Consultation

Employment Law Protective Award Redundancy Collective Consultation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Miss L Mumford

Claimant

Qube Qualifications and Development Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy
2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements and awarded the claimant a protective award.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted in favour of the claimant.

Orders

Respondent to pay the claimant a protective award for failure to consult.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.